McNeely et al v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. et al
Lisa McNeely and Michael McNeely |
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., Home Equity Loan Trust 2007-FRE-1 and Nationstar Mortgage, LLC |
2:2013cv25114 |
October 10, 2013 |
US District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia |
Charleston Office |
Putnam |
Joseph R. Goodwin |
Consumer Credit |
15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 70 MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER granting in part and denying in part defendants' 48 MOTION for Summary Judgment; dismissing, with prejudice, all claims brought by Michael McNeely; Lisa McNeely's claim for illegal debt collection based on t he September 2012 loan modification process; Lisa McNeely's claim for illegal fees based on the 27 assessments identified in the 37 Amended Complaint; and Lisa McNeely's claim for actual damages arising from Count I of the Amended Complaint. Signed by Judge Joseph R. Goodwin on 7/24/2015. (cc: counsel of record; any unrepresented party)(published to the court's website, www.wvsd.uscourts.gov.) (taq) |
Filing 35 MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER granting plaintiffs' 31 MOTION to Amend Complaint Attached to 1 Notice of Removal; denying as moot defendants' 28 MOTION for Summary Judgment. Signed by Judge Joseph R. Goodwin on 4/2/2015. (cc: attys; any unrepresented party) (tmh) |
Filing 23 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER granting in part and denying in part the defendants 15 MOTION for Judgment on the Pleadings; dismissing Counts I, II, III, and IV. Signed by Judge Joseph R. Goodwin on 12/10/2014. (cc: attys; any unrepresented party) (taq) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.