Douty v. Rubenstein et al
Plaintiff: Fred D. Douty
Defendant: Jim Rubenstein, David Ballard, Paul Perry, Ronnie Williams, Daniel Hahn, Andrew Hudson, Joshua Hypes, Chris Hess, Nicholas Boychuck and Joe Wimmer
Case Number: 2:2013cv32832
Filed: August 7, 2014
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia
Office: Charleston Office
County: Fayette
Presiding Judge: Dwane L. Tinsley
Presiding Judge: John T. Copenhaver
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
June 15, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 203 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER adopting the 201 Proposed Findings and Recommendations by Magistrate Judge; granting in part and denying in part Defendants' 169 Motion for Summary Judgment; granting as to plaintiffs claims against defendants Rubenstein, Perry, Williams, and Hahn; granting as to plaintiffs claim against defendant Hudson for battery occurring on September 30, 2013; denying as to all other claims; dismissing Defendants Rubenstein, Perry, Williams, and Hahn from this action. Signed by Judge John T. Copenhaver, Jr. on 6/15/2016. (cc: plaintiff; all counsel of record; the magistrate judge) (tmh)
August 7, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 162 MEMORANDUM AND OPINION dismissing as moot plaintiff's 98 OBJECTIONS to Magistrate Judge R. Clarke VanDervort's 91 Order. Signed by Judge John T. Copenhaver, Jr. on 8/7/2015. (cc: counsel of record; any unrepresented parties) (tmh)
July 9, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 158 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER granting plaintiff's 123 MOTION to Compel; directing defendants to produce any documents responsive to the request to plaintiff by 7/31/2015. Signed by Magistrate Judge R. Clarke VanDervort on 7/9/2015. (cc: plaintiff, pro se; counsel of record) (taq)
April 7, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 102 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER granting in part and denying in part Plaintiff's 75 MOTION to Compel Discovery as more fully set forth herein; directing defendants to produce any documents responsive to the requests as specifically directed herein to the Plaintiff by 4/24/2015. Signed by Magistrate Judge R. Clarke VanDervort on 4/7/2015. (cc: Plaintiff; counsel of record) (tmh)
April 6, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 100 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER granting in part and denying in part plaintiff's 65 MOTION to Compel as more fully set forth herein; directing Defendants to produce any documents responsive to the requests as specifically directed herein by 4/24/2015. Signed by Magistrate Judge R. Clarke VanDervort on 4/6/2015. (cc: Plaintiff; counsel of record) (tmh)
February 20, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 73 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER re: plaintiff's 55 OBJECTIONS AND BRIEF IN OPPOSITION to 49 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER denying Plaintiff's 40 MOTION for Compelling Discovery and Sanctions, and 71 MOTION for Status Hearing re: 55 OBJECTIONS AND BRIEF IN OPPOSITION; denying plaintiff's 71 Motion for Status Hearing re: 55 OBJECTIONS AND BRIEF IN OPPOSITION; directing that the 12/8/2014 49 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER is affirmed except that it is modified as more fully set forth herein. Signed by Judge John T. Copenhaver, Jr. on 2/20/2015. (cc: attys; any unrepresented parties; plaintiff) (tmh)
December 8, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 49 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER denying Plaintiff's 40 MOTION for Compelling Discovery and Sanctions. Signed by Magistrate Judge R. Clarke VanDervort on 12/8/2014. (cc: pro se Plaintiff; attys) (tmh)
August 29, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 30 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER having concluded that the 28 objections lack merit; adopting and incorporating the 16 Proposed Findings and Recommendation herein; denying without prejudice the plaintiff's 5 MOTION for a preliminary injunction; this case is recommitted to the magistrate judge pursuant to the terms of the previously entered standing order. Signed by Judge John T. Copenhaver, Jr. on 8/29/2014. (cc: plaintiff, pro se; counsel of record) (taq)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the West Virginia Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Douty v. Rubenstein et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Fred D. Douty
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Jim Rubenstein
Represented By: Mark W. Browning
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: David Ballard
Represented By: Mark W. Browning
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Paul Perry
Represented By: Mark W. Browning
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Ronnie Williams
Represented By: Mark W. Browning
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Daniel Hahn
Represented By: Mark W. Browning
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Andrew Hudson
Represented By: Mark W. Browning
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Joshua Hypes
Represented By: Mark W. Browning
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Chris Hess
Represented By: Mark W. Browning
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Nicholas Boychuck
Represented By: Mark W. Browning
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Joe Wimmer
Represented By: Mark W. Browning
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?