Davis v. Thompson et al
Markus Levar Davis |
J. M. Thompson, Stover, Keeney, John Doe, South Charleston Police Department and City of South Charleston |
2:2014cv20467 |
October 1, 2014 |
US District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia |
Charleston Office |
Kanawha |
Thomas E. Johnston |
Dwane L. Tinsley |
Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 42 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER the Court ADOPTS the 40 Proposed Findings and Recommendation by Magistrate Judge; and DISMISSES this case from the docket. Signed by Judge Thomas E. Johnston on 3/27/2017. (cc: counsel of record; any unrepresented party) (taq) |
Filing 31 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER adopting the 27 Proposed Findings and Recommendation by Magistrate Judge; granting the 23 Motion to Dismiss filed by South Charleston Police Department; and dismissing the South Charleston Police Department as a defendant herein. Signed by Judge Thomas E. Johnston on 5/31/2016. (cc: counsel of record; any unrepresented party) (taq) |
Filing 19 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER adopting the 17 Proposed Findings and Recommendations by Magistrate Judge, denying without prejudice the identified Defendants' 15 MOTION to Dismiss, and quashing the service of the summonses which were improperly served on the identified Defendants. Signed by Judge Thomas E. Johnston on 8/14/2015. (cc: counsel of record; any unrepresented party) (tmh) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.