Blankenship v. Colvin

Blankenship v. Colvin

Plaintiff:	Diana Lynn Blankenship
Defendant:	Carolyn W. Colvin
Case Number:	2:2014cv27469
Filed:	November 3, 2014
Court:	US District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia
Office:	Charleston Office
County:	Kanawha
Presiding Judge:	Dwane L. Tinsley
Presiding Judge:	John T. Copenhaver
Nature of Suit:	Disability Insurance
Cause of Action:	42 U.S.C. § 405
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
March 21, 2016	Filing 16 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER adopting the 15 Proposed Findings and Recommendation by Magistrate Judge; granting the plaintiff's 12 Brief in Support of Judgment on the Pleadings; denying the defendant's 13 Brief in Support of the defendant's Decision; the decision of the Commissioner is reversed; and this matter is remanded pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) for further proceedings to specify which cashier position Claimant could perform; to compl ete the requisite analyses under SSR 82-61 and SSR 82-62; to make findings of fact as to the physical and mental demands of Claimant's past relevant job as a cashier; and to address other issues identified by the magistrate judge in the Proposed Findings and Recommendation as requiring further evaluation and resolution. Signed by Judge John T. Copenhaver, Jr. on 3/21/2016. (cc: counsel of record; United States Magistrate Judge) (taq)

Date Filed

Document Text

March 21, 2016

Filing 16 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER adopting the 15 Proposed Findings and Recommendation by Magistrate Judge; granting the plaintiff's 12 Brief in Support of Judgment on the Pleadings; denying the defendant's 13 Brief in Support of the defendant's Decision; the decision of the Commissioner is reversed; and this matter is remanded pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) for further proceedings to specify which cashier position Claimant could perform; to compl ete the requisite analyses under SSR 82-61 and SSR 82-62; to make findings of fact as to the physical and mental demands of Claimant's past relevant job as a cashier; and to address other issues identified by the magistrate judge in the Proposed Findings and Recommendation as requiring further evaluation and resolution. Signed by Judge John T. Copenhaver, Jr. on 3/21/2016. (cc: counsel of record; United States Magistrate Judge) (taq)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the West Virginia Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Blankenship v. Colvin
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Diana Lynn Blankenship
Represented By:	Jan Dils
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Carolyn W. Colvin
Represented By:	Eric P. Kressman
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?