National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, PA v. Sparks et al
| National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, PA |
| Michael Sparks and Deloris "Dee" Sidebottom |
| 2:2014cv30221 |
| December 18, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia |
| Charleston Office |
| Mingo |
| John T. Copenhaver |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
23
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER pursuant to the civil actions referenced herein, denying the 8 MOTION by Deloris "Dee" Sidebottom to Dismiss 1 Complaint for Declaratory Judgment and MOTION by Deloris "Dee" Sidebottom for Judgmen t on the Pleadings, granting the 18 MOTION by Wesley Kent Varney To Be Excused From Hearings, granting the 20 MOTION by Deloris "Dee" Sidebottom to File Out of Time her Rule 26(a)(1) Disclosures to June 16, 2015, extending the time to file Rule 26(a)(1) Disclosures to 7/10/2015, and as more fully set forth herein. Signed by Judge John T. Copenhaver, Jr. on 7/2/2015. (cc: counsel of record; guardians ad litem; any unrepresented parties) (tmh)
|
|
Filing
14
ORDER re: 11 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER; directing that Mr. Varney file no later than 4/30/2015, a written summary reflecting on the record the efforts he has undertaken to comply with the 3/6/2015 order, and any response thereto as of that date by Mr. Sparks. Signed by Judge John T. Copenhaver, Jr. on 4/21/2015. (cc: counsel of record; guardians ad litem; any unrepresented parties) (tmh)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
