Staples et al v. Yates et al
Don Juan Staples and Deborah Lawson Staples |
Jason Yates, James Tomasik, Yulanda Gancs and David R. Karr, Jr. |
2:2023cv00429 |
June 9, 2023 |
US District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia |
Joseph R Goodwin |
Dwane L Tinsley |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 28, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 21 MEMORANDUM OF LAW by Deborah Lawson Staples, Don Juan Staples in support of #20 Response In Opposition. (lca) |
Filing 20 RESPONSE by Don Juan Staples in opposition to the #7 MOTION by David R. Karr, Jr. to Dismiss #1 Complaint, #11 MOTION by Jason Yates to Dismiss With Prejudice re: #1 Complaint, and #9 MOTION by Yulanda Gancs to Dismiss For Failure to State a Claim or Cause of Action re: #1 Complaint. (lca) |
Filing 19 RESPONSE by Jason Yates in opposition to #17 MOTION by Don Juan Staples for Leave to Amend the #1 Complaint (Kluemper, Tai) |
Filing 18 COMMERCIAL AFFIDAVIT by Don Juan Staples in support of #17 MOTION by Don Juan Staples for Leave to Amend the #1 Complaint. (kew) |
Filing 17 MOTION by Don Juan Staples for Leave to Amend the #1 Complaint and Memorandum of Law in Support. (Attachment: #1 Proposed Amended Complaint and Memorandum of Law in Support). Motion referred to Magistrate Judge Dwane L. Tinsley. (kew) |
Filing 16 ADDENDUM to #9 MOTION by Yulanda Gancs to Dismiss For Failure to State a Claim or Cause of Action re: #1 Complaint. Motion referred to Magistrate Judge Dwane L. Tinsley.(Lindroth, Richard) |
Filing 15 ORDER directing any Responses to #11 MOTION by Jason Yates to Dismiss With Prejudice re: #1 Complaint, and #9 MOTION by Yulanda Gancs to Dismiss For Failure to State a Claim or Cause of Action re: #1 Complaint be filed by 7/14/2023; Replies, if applicable, due by 7/21/2023. Signed by Magistrate Judge Dwane L. Tinsley on 6/30/2023. (cc: counsel of record; any unrepresented party) (tmr) |
Filing 14 AMENDED CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Jason Yates re: #12 MEMORANDUM OF LAW by Jason Yates in support of #11 MOTION by Jason Yates to Dismiss With Prejudice re: #1 Complaint. (Kluemper, Tai) (Modified on 6/30/2023 to add link to #12 memorandum in support) (mk). |
Filing 13 AMENDED CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Jason Yates re: #11 MOTION by Jason Yates to Dismiss With Prejudice re: #1 Complaint. (Kluemper, Tai) (Modified on 6/30/2023 to add link to #11 motion to dismiss) (mk). |
Filing 12 MEMORANDUM OF LAW by Jason Yates in support of #11 MOTION by Jason Yates to Dismiss With Prejudice re: #1 Complaint. (Kluemper, Tai) (Modified on 6/30/2023 to correct link) (mk). |
Filing 11 MOTION by Jason Yates to Dismiss With Prejudice re: #1 Complaint. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D) Motion referred to Magistrate Judge Dwane L. Tinsley.(Kluemper, Tai) (Modified on 6/30/2023 to add link to #1 complaint and to convert event to motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim) (mk). |
Filing 10 NOTICE OF CHANGE OF ADDRESS by Don Juan Staples. (tmr) |
Filing 9 MOTION by Yulanda Gancs to Dismiss For Failure to State a Claim or Cause of Action re: #1 Complaint. (Attachment: #1 Trustee Report of Sale). Motion referred to Magistrate Judge Dwane L. Tinsley.(Lindroth, Richard) (Modified on 6/28/2023 to add link to #1 complaint) (mk). |
Filing 8 ORDER directing Plaintiffs to file any response(s) to Defendant David R. Karr, Jr.'s #7 MOTION to Dismiss on or before 7/10/2023; Defendants are directed to file any reply thereto, if applicable, on or before 7/17/2023; further directing Plaintiffs to review this Court's Pro Se Handbook, including Section 9 regarding Motions, as well as this Court's Local Rules of Civil Procedure, including Local Rule 7.1, prior to filing a response. Signed by Magistrate Judge Dwane L. Tinsley on 6/27/2023. (cc: counsel of record; any unrepresented party) (jsa) |
Filing 7 MOTION by David R. Karr, Jr. to Dismiss #1 Complaint. Motion referred to Magistrate Judge Dwane L. Tinsley. (Karr, David) |
Filing 6 ANSWER TO #1 Complaint by James Tomasik. (Dawson, Christopher) |
Filing 5 SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED BY CERTIFIED MAIL for Yulanda Gancs, David R. Karr, Jr., James Tomasik, re: #1 Complaint. Yulanda Gancs, David R. Karr, Jr., James Tomasik served on 6/12/2023, answer due 7/3/2023. (Attachments: #1 Return Receipt for David R. Karr, Jr., #2 Return Receipt for James Tomasik) (kew) |
Filing 4 STANDING ORDER IN RE: ASSIGNMENT AND REFERRAL OF CIVIL ACTIONS AND MATTERS TO MAGISTRATE JUDGES ENTERED JANUARY 4, 2016. This case is referred to Magistrate Judge Dwane L. Tinsley for Findings of Fact and Recommendations for disposition. (cc: attys; any unrepresented party) (klc) |
CASE assigned to Judge Joseph R. Goodwin. (klc) |
Filing 3 SUMMONS ISSUED by the Clerk via Certified Mail, Return Receipt, Restricted Delivery on behalf of Don Juan Staples, Deborah Lawson Staples for Yulanda Gancs, David R. Karr, Jr., James Tomasik, Jason Yates, re: #1 Complaint, returnable 21 days. (Attachments: #1 Certified Mail Receipt and Summons Issued as to David R. Karr, Jr., #2 Certified Mail Receipt and Summons Issued as to James Tomasik, #3 Certified Mail Receipt and Summons Issued as to Jason Yates) (kew) |
Filing 2 LETTER TO CLERK from Don Juan Staples requesting service of summonses. (kew) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT. Filing Fee $402.00. Receipt # 2001307. (Attachments: #1 Exhibits 1-3, #2 Proposed Summons as to David R. Karr, Jr., #3 Proposed Summons as to James Tomasik, #4 Proposed Summons as to Jason Yates, #5 Proposed Summons as to Yulanda Gancs, #6 Receipt, #7 Civil Cover Sheet) (kew) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.