Brooks v. United States of America
3:2005cv00163 |
February 23, 2005 |
US District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia |
Huntington Office |
Robert C. Chambers |
Maurice G. Taylor, Jr. |
Prisoner: Vacate Sentence |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 155 ORDER For the reasons set forth in the Proposed Findings and Recommendations of the Magistrate Judge, the Court Denies Mr. Brooks' 153 Objections as to Joestilles DeMarco Brooks; the Court further Adopts the 152 Magistrate Judge's Prop osed Findings and Recommendations, Denies, Mr. Brooks' motion, and Dismisses, With Prejudice, this case from the docket of the Court; the Court Denies a certificate of appealability. Signed by Judge Robert C. Chambers on 6/3/2014. (cc: attys; any unrepresented party) (skm) |
Filing 123 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER for reasons already noted, the Magistrate Judge's re: 120 Proposed Findings and Recommendations are Adopted; Petitioner's Objection is Denied and Petitioner's 97 Motion / Application / Petition to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct Sentence (2255) is Dismissed. The Court further Denies a certificate of appealability in this matter. Signed by Judge Robert C. Chambers on 3/18/2011. (cc: attys; any unrepresented party) (skm) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Brooks v. United States of America | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.