Fifth Third Bank v. McClure Properties, Inc.
||Fifth Third Bank
||McClure Properties, Inc. and Victor A. McClure
||March 27, 2008
||West Virginia Southern District Court
||Negotiable Instrument Office
||Robert C. Chambers
|Nature of Suit:
|Cause of Action:
|Jury Demanded By:
||28:1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|Date Filed||#||Document Text|
|July 9, 2010
MEMORANDUM OPINION ORDER granting 53 MOTION for Summary Judgment; denying as moot 69 MOTION in Limine. The court finds the McClure Defendants in default of the May 2006 loan agreement in the principal sum due, plus accrued but unpaid interest, an d for all late fees, fines, expenses and advances accrued on the note. Additionally, the Court enters judgment against Defendant McClure, individually, on the same. Due to the discrepancy in the amounts plaintiff has claimed are due, the Court Orde rs plaintiff to file an accounting that provides an explanation of the amount within 14 days. If they so choose, defendants are ordered to submit any response to plaintiff's accounting within 7 days of its filing. Finally, the Court finds the McClure defendants must pay Fifth Third's reasonable costs and expenses, including the bank's attorneys' fees. Signed by Judge Robert C. Chambers on 7/8/2010. (cc: attys; any unrepresented party) (dcm)
|August 3, 2010
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER denying 81 MOTION to Stay. The Court Orders any response shall be submitted on or before Friday, 08/06/2010. Signed by Judge Robert C. Chambers on 8/3/2010. (cc: attys; any unrepresented party) (skm)
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the West Virginia Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets were retrieved from PACER, and should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.