Bailey v. Branch Banking & Trust Company

Plaintiff: Jeremy Bailey
Defendant: Branch Banking & Trust Company
Case Number: 3:2010cv00969
Filed: July 30, 2010
Court: West Virginia Southern District Court
Office: Huntington Office
County: Kanawha
Nature of Suit: Other
Cause of Action: 77:7777
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
June 23, 2011 150 Opinion or Order of the Court MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER denying Defendant's 87 MOTION for Summary Judgment as to the Counterclaim; denying 89 Defendant's MOTION for Summary Judgment as to the Complaint's Common Law Claims; the Court also denies defendant's 94 and 96 requests for hearings on both motions. Signed by Judge Robert C. Chambers on 6/23/2011. (cc: attys; any unrepresented party) (dcm)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the West Virginia Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Bailey v. Branch Banking & Trust Company
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jeremy Bailey
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Branch Banking & Trust Company
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.