James v. City of Huntington, West Virginia et al
||Cabell County, City of Huntington, West Virginia and Bracht Peoples
||Barry L. James
||July 17, 2012
||West Virginia Southern District Court
||Robert C. Chambers
||Cheryl A. Eifert
|Nature of Suit:
||Other Civil Rights
|Cause of Action:
|Jury Demanded By:
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|Date Filed||#||Document Text|
|September 13, 2012
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER directing plaintiff to amend his complaint within 45 days of the date of this Order and cure the various deficiencies in pleading; noticing plaintiff that a failure to amend the complaint as directed may result in a recom mendation that the complaint, or a portion of the complaint, be dismissed for failure to state a claim compensable at law; Plaintiff's 2 Application to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees and Costs shall be held in abeyance pending initial review of Plaintiff's amended complaint or pending other further proceedings in this case. Signed by Magistrate Judge Cheryl A. Eifert on 9/13/2012. (cc: Plaintiff) (mkw)
|October 3, 2013
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER adopting and incorporating Magistate Judge Eifert's 7 Proposed Findings and Recommendation; denying Plaintiff's 2 APPLICATION to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees and Costs, DISMISSING the 1 Complaint without prejudice, and removing this matter from the docket of the Court, consistent with the findings and recommendations. Signed by Judge Robert C. Chambers on 10/3/2013. (cc: attys; any unrepresented parties) (mkw)
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the West Virginia Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets were retrieved from PACER, and should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.