Canada Pipeline Accessories Co., Ltd. v. Canalta Controls, Ltd.

Justia Dockets & Filings Fourth Circuit West Virginia Southern District Canada Pipeline Accessories Co., Ltd. v. Canalta Controls, Ltd.

Canada Pipeline Accessories Co., Ltd. v. Canalta Controls, Ltd.

Plaintiff:	Canada Pipeline Accessories Co., Ltd.
Defendant:	Canalta Controls, Ltd.
Case Number:	3:2012cv08448
Filed:	December 3, 2012
Court:	US District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia
Office:	Huntington Office
County:	XX Outside US
Presiding Judge:	Robert C. Chambers
Nature of Suit:	Trademark
Cause of Action:	15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
Jury Demanded By:	Plaintiff

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
June 25, 2013	Filing 40 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER granting in part and denying in part Plaintiff CPA's 15 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim; CPA's motion to dismiss Count VI of the counterclaims is granted only to the extent that Count VI allege s a claim for relief based on tortious interference with independent testing laboratories; Count VI of the counterclaims may proceed, however, as to the alleged tortious interference with Canalta clients; CPA's motion to dismiss Counts II and V of the counterclaims is DENIED; denying Defendant Dale Sawchuk's 25 MOTION to Dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction and finding that its exercise of personal jurisdiction over Mr. Sawchuk is proper. Signed by Judge Robert C. Chambers on 6/25/2013. (cc: attys; any unrepresented parties) (mkw)

Date Filed

Document Text

June 25, 2013

Filing 40 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER granting in part and denying in part Plaintiff CPA's 15 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim; CPA's motion to dismiss Count VI of the counterclaims is granted only to the extent that Count VI allege s a claim for relief based on tortious interference with independent testing laboratories; Count VI of the counterclaims may proceed, however, as to the alleged tortious interference with Canalta clients; CPA's motion to dismiss Counts II and V of the counterclaims is DENIED; denying Defendant Dale Sawchuk's 25 MOTION to Dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction and finding that its exercise of personal jurisdiction over Mr. Sawchuk is proper. Signed by Judge Robert C. Chambers on 6/25/2013. (cc: attys; any unrepresented parties) (mkw)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the West Virginia Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Canada Pipeline Accessories Co., Ltd. v. Canalta Controls, Ltd.
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Canada Pipeline Accessories Co., Ltd.
Represented By:	Charles W. Pace, Jr.
Represented By:	Robert B. Allen
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Canalta Controls, Ltd.
Represented By:	W. Jeffrey Vollmer
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?