Tinsley v. OneWest Bank, FSB
Plaintiff: Betty Tinsley
Defendant: OneWest Bank, FSB
Case Number: 3:2013cv23241
Filed: September 19, 2013
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia
Office: Huntington Office
County: Putnam
Presiding Judge: Robert C. Chambers
Nature of Suit: Other Contract
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
December 10, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 72 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER granting in part and denying in part Plaintiff's 46 MOTION to Compel Production of Discovery Requests from the Defendant; denying Plaintiff's 46 REQUEST for Reasonable Attorney Fees. Signed by Magistrate Judge Cheryl A. Eifert on 12/10/2014. (cc: attys) (mkw)
July 24, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 52 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER granting in part and denying in part 34 MOTION by Betty Tinsley to Amend Second Amended Complaint and denying 42 AMENDED MOTION by Betty Tinsley to Amend Second Amended Complaint; directing Plaintiff to file a newly d rafted Third Amended Complaint within 14 days of the entry of this Memorandum Opinion and Order which solely amends the Second Amended Complaint to include the proposed amendments to that Complaint which allege violations under West Virginia Code  67;§ 46A-2-125(d) and 46A-2-128(e); directing that absolutely none of the other amendments in the proposed 42 Amended Third Amended Complaint, including changed exhibit numbers, additional references to exhibits, notations of which claims have been dismissed, and additional facts and legal theories-are to be included in this newly drafted Third Amended Complaint. Signed by Judge Robert C. Chambers on 7/24/2014. (cc: attys; any unrepresented parties) (mkw)
March 14, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 32 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER granting in part and denying in part Defendant's 12 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim; all other claims, including Plaintiff's other breach of contract claim, all of Plaintiff's fraud and in tentional misrepresentation claims, all of Plaintiff's other WVCCPA claims, all of Plaintiff's intentional infliction of emotional distress claims, and all of Plaintiff's negligence or reckless or negligent misrepresentation claims are DISMISSED; denying as moot Plaintiff's 26 MOTION Requesting Hearing on Defendant's Motion to Dismiss. Signed by Judge Robert C. Chambers on 3/14/2014. (cc: attys; any unrepresented parties) (mkw)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the West Virginia Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Tinsley v. OneWest Bank, FSB
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: OneWest Bank, FSB
Represented By: Reid S. Manley
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Betty Tinsley
Represented By: Mitchell Lee Klein
Represented By: Benjamin Sheridan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?