Murphy v. International Painters and Allied Trades Industry Pension Fund et al
Bryan Donald Murphy |
International Painters and Allied Trades Industry Pension Fund, Gary J. Meyers and Board of Trustees of the International Painters and Allied Trades Industry Fund |
3:2013cv28760 |
November 19, 2013 |
US District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia |
Huntington Office |
Cabell |
Robert C. Chambers |
Cheryl A. Eifert |
Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 |
29 U.S.C. ยง 1132 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 40 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER adopting and incorporating the 37 Proposed Findings and Recommendations of the Magistrate Judge; denying Plaintiff's 39 OBJECTIONS; denying Defendants' 38 LIMITED OBJECTION; granting in part and denying i n part Plaintiff's 29 MOTION for Summary Judgment; granting in part and denying in part Defendants' 31 MOTION for Summary Judgment; finding that a genuine issue of material fact exists as to part of Count III of Plaintiff's Comp laint and AWARDING the sum of $7,450.00 to Plaintiff; further referring this action back to the Magistrate Judge for further proceedings consistent with this decision. Signed by Judge Robert C. Chambers on 9/29/2015. (cc: Magistrate Judge Eifert, counsel of record and any unrepresented parties) (mkw) |
Filing 5 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER SEALING EXHIBITS directing the exhibits attached to the 3 Complaint to be sealed. Signed by Magistrate Judge Cheryl A. Eifert on 11/15/2013. (cc: Plaintiff, attys) (mkw) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.