Adkins et al v. CMH Homes Inc. et al
| William Howard Adkins and Marrian A. Adkins |
| CMH Homes Inc., Vanderbilt Mortgage and Finance, Inc. and John Doe Holder |
| 3:2013cv32123 |
| December 13, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia |
| Huntington Office |
| Cabell |
| Robert C. Chambers |
| Other Contract |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
157
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER denying Defendant CMH Homes, Inc.'s 98 MOTION for Summary Judgment; denying Defendant Vanderbilt Mortgage's 100 MOTION for Summary Judgment; denying Defendant Vanderbilt Mortgage's 102 MOTION for Summary Judgment on Counterclaims. Signed by Judge Robert C. Chambers on 4/14/2015. (cc: attys; any unrepresented parties) (mkw)
|
|
Filing
97
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER granting 70 MOTION to Quash Subpoenas; denying 82 MOTION for a mental examination; denying 91 MOTION to Compel; however the Court Grants Defendants certain limited discovery into the issue of Plaintiff's d iagnosis of dementia and her competency at the time she executed a Power of Attorney in favor of her husband; the Court Grants Defendants leave to conduct limited discovery as outlined within this Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Cheryl A. Eifert on 12/9/2014. (cc: attys; any unrepresented party) (skm)
|
|
Filing
61
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER granting Plaintiff's 41 MOTION to Quash the subpoena issued to Radiology, Inc., and denying Plaintiff's 41 MOTION to quash and 59 MOTION for a protective order regarding the subpoenas seeking communications with debt collection companies; denying Plaintiffs' motion to quash the remaining subpoenas, as moot. Signed by Magistrate Judge Cheryl A. Eifert on 9/10/2014. (cc: attys; any unrepresented party) (mkw)
|
|
Filing
15
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER denying in part and reserving judgment in part Defendants CMH Homes and Vanderbilt Mortgage's 6 MOTION to Dismiss Complaint; denying Defendants' motion to dismiss Counts I and II, and reserving judgment regard ing Defendants' motion to dismiss Count III; directing Plaintiffs to file, within 14 days of the entry of this Memorandum Opinion and Order, an Amended Complaint setting out in greater detail the facts supporting Count III; such amended complain t shall be identical to the existing Complaint in all other respects; within 14 days of the filing of the Amended Complaint, directing Defendants to file a Supplemental Memorandum to their Motion to Dismiss, if they wish to persist in their motion to dismiss Count III; Plaintiffs may file a Supplemental Response to such Memorandum within 7 days of Defendants' filing. Signed by Judge Robert C. Chambers on 5/19/2014. (cc: attys; any unrepresented parties) (skm)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
