Watkins v. Lincare Inc.
| Jillian Watkins |
| Lincare Inc. |
| 3:2022cv00109 |
| March 2, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia |
| Robert C Chambers |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 30, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 8
ORDER AND NOTICE: Rule 12(b) Motions - 5/16/2022. Rule 26(f) Meeting - 5/31/2022. Last day to file report of Rule 26(f) Meeting - 6/6/2022. Scheduling/status conference at 11:30 AM on 6/21/2022 in Huntington. Entry of Scheduling Order - 6/27/2022. Last Day to make Rule 26(a)(1) disclosures - 7/5/2022. Signed by Judge Robert C. Chambers on 4/25/2022. (cc: counsel of record; any unrepresented parties) (cla)
|
|
Filing 7
MEMORANDUM OF LAW by Lincare Inc. in support of #6 MOTION by Lincare Inc. to Dismiss #1 Complaint. (Hammond, Jason)
|
|
Filing 6
MOTION by Lincare Inc. to Dismiss #1 Complaint. (Hammond, Jason)
|
|
Filing 5
STIPULATION REGARDING TIMEFRAME TO ANSWER by Jillian Watkins, Lincare Inc.; the parties stipulate and agree that the answer and/or responsive pleading of Lincare, Inc., re: #1 Complaint will be due on 4/22/2022. (Hammond, Jason) (Modified on 4/12/2022 to add party filer) (mkw).
|
|
RESET DEADLINE: Lincare Inc. answer due 4/22/2022. (mkw)
|
|
Filing 4
SUMMONS ACCEPTED FOR SERVICE BY SECRETARY OF STATE on 3/18/2022 as to Lincare Inc. Certified Mail Number: 92148901125134100003481304. (Adams, Carol)
|
|
CASE assigned to Judge Robert C. Chambers. (klc)
|
|
Filing 3
STANDING ORDER IN RE: ASSIGNMENT AND REFERRAL OF CIVIL ACTIONS AND MATTERS TO MAGISTRATE JUDGES ENTERED JANUARY 4, 2016. Discovery referred to Magistrate Judge Eifert. (cc: counsel of record; any unrepresented party) (jsa)
|
|
Filing 2
ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED as to Lincare Inc., re: #1 Complaint. Summons returnable 21 days. Instructions to Counsel: This is your electronic summons. Please print as many copies of the Summons and Complaint as are necessary to effectuate service under Fed. R. Civ. P. 4. See Proof of Service page of this Summons form for filing a return of service if required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(l). (jsa)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT. Filing Fee $402.00. Receipt # AWVSDC-8142348. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Summons, #2 Civil Cover Sheet) (jsa)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Watkins v. Lincare Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Jillian Watkins | |
| Represented By: | Ashley N. Lynch |
| Represented By: | Guy R. Bucci |
| Represented By: | Michael Alexander Urban |
| Represented By: | Rodney Arthur Smith |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Lincare Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Jason S. Hammond |
| Represented By: | Suleiman O. Oko-ogua |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
