Treadway et al v. BGS Construction, Inc.

Case Number: 5:2006cv00191
Filed: March 15, 2006
Court: West Virginia Southern District Court
Office: Beckley Office
Presiding Judge: Thomas E. Johnston
Nature of Suit: Labor: Railway Labor Act
Cause of Action: 29:201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
May 13, 2009 176 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER GRANTING APPROVAL OF FLSA SETTLEMENT: The stay imposed by the Court's Order of 03/05/2009, is LIFTED; Plaintiff's 175 MOTION for Approval of Settlement and exhibits attached thereto is GRANTED; Plaintiff's counsel are AWARDED a ttorney's fees and reimbursement of expenses and costs in the prosecution of this case in the sum of $90,000.00 to be divided as agreed; Directing Defendant to make payments in the manner and according to the schedule agreed in the settlement; The above-styled action is DISMISSED with prejudice. Signed by Judge Thomas E. Johnston on 5/13/2009. (cc: attys; any unrepresented party) (mls)
August 21, 2009 179 Opinion or Order of the Court FINAL JUDGMENT ORDER: granting Plaintiffs' 177 MOTION to Convert Settlement to Judgment; entering Judgment in favor of plaintiffs against defendant BGS Construction in the total amount of $281,040.75, plus interest. Signed by Judge Thomas E. Johnston on 8/21/2009. (cc: attys; any unrepresented party) (slr)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the West Virginia Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Treadway et al v. BGS Construction, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.