United States et al v. Purdue Pharma L. P. et al
| United States, State of California, State of Georgia, State of Illinois, State of New York, State of Tennessee, Steven May and Angela Radcliffe |
| Purdue Pharma L. P. and Purdue Pharma, Inc. |
| 5:2010cv01423 |
| December 30, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia |
| Beckley Office |
| Raleigh |
| Irene C. Berger |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 31 U.S.C. ยง 3729 False Claims Act |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
231
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: The Court ORDERS that Defendants Purdue Pharma L.P. and Purdue Pharma Inc.'s 216 MOTION for Attorneys' Fees and Expenses be DENIED. Signed by Judge Irene C. Berger on 5/20/2015. (cc: attys; any unrepresented party) (slr)
|
|
Filing
191
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: That Relators' objections to Interrogatory Nos. 2, 3, and 4 of Purdue's First Set of Interrogatories and deposition questions during the depositions of Mark and Angela Radcliffe and Steven May respecting commu nications between Relators and Mark Radcliffe and Relators and their attorneys with Mark Radcliffe present respecting how and when Relators gained knowledge of the circumstances underlying their claims of fraud are OVERRULED and Purdue's [ 168] and 177 MOTIONS to Compel are GRANTED. Signed by Magistrate Judge R. Clarke VanDervort on 10/08/2014. (cc: attys; any unrepresented party) (msa)
|
|
Filing
181
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER denying Realtor's 155 MOTION to Quash Subpoenas Seeking to Depose Their Counsel. Signed by Magistrate Judge R. Clarke VanDervort on 10/2/2014. (cc: attys; any unrepresented party) (cds)
|
|
Filing
51
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: The Court does hereby ORDER that Defendants 23 Purdue Pharma L.P. and Purdue Pharma Inc.'s Motion to Dismiss Relators' Complaint With Prejudice be GRANTED. Specifically, the Court ORDERS that the Relators' FCA claim be DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE and that the Relators' state claims be DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE consistent with the ruling herein. Signed by Judge Irene C. Berger on 9/14/2012. (cc: attys; any unrepresented party) (msa)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
