Bibbs v. New River Community and Technical College et al 
| Plaintiff: |
Richard L. Bibbs |
| Defendants: |
New River Community and Technical College , Ted D. Spring and Leah A. Taylor |
| |
| Case Number: |
5:2011cv00519 |
| Filed: |
April 23, 2012 |
| |
| Court: |
West Virginia Southern District Court |
| Office: |
Beckley Office |
| County: |
Fayette |
| Presiding Judge: |
Irene C. Berger |
| Referring Judge: |
R. Clarke VanDervort |
| |
| Nature of Suit: |
Civil Rights - Employment |
| Cause: |
42:1981 |
| Jurisdiction: |
Federal Question |
| Jury Demanded By: |
Plaintiff |
| |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download.
| Date Filed | # | Document Text |
|---|
| December 6, 2012 | 110 | ORDER: It is ORDERED that Plaintiff's 95 MOTION for Sanctions is DENIED. Signed by Magistrate Judge R. Clarke VanDervort on 12/6/2012. (cc: attys; any unrepresented party) (slr) |
| September 12, 2012 | 54 | MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: denying Plaintiff's 32 MOTION to Compel Disclosure of Discovery Requests; denying Defendants' 37 MOTION for Protective Order; denying Plaintiff's 40 MOTION for Protective Order; Plaintiff is directed to respond to the specified interrogatories by 10/12/2012. Signed by Magistrate Judge R. Clarke VanDervort on 9/12/2012. (cc: attys; any unrepresented party) (slr) |
| July 19, 2012 | 27 | MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER ADOPTING PROPOSED FINDING AND RECOMMENDATION: The Court ADOPTS and incorporates herein the findings and recommendation of the Magistrate Judge as contained in the 20 Proposed Findings and Recommendation. The Court OR DERS that the Defendants New River Community and Technical College, President Ted D. Spring and Human Resource Director Leah A. Taylor's 10 Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint be DENIED. Signed by Judge Irene C. Berger on 7/19/2012. (cc: USMJ VanDervort; attys; any unrepresented party) (msa) |
Last Document Downloaded: December 7, 2012 07:22:07 PST
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to
PACER is required.