Daugherty v. Huttonsville Correctional Center
Petitioner: Tony Daugherty
Respondent: Huttonsville Correctional Center
Case Number: 5:2012cv00043
Filed: January 10, 2012
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia
Office: Beckley Office
County: XX US, Outside State
Presiding Judge: Irene C. Berger
Presiding Judge: R. Clarke VanDervort
Nature of Suit: General
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
October 2, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 203 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER adopting the Magistrate Judge's 201 Proposed Findings and Recommendations and dismissing Petitioner's 187 Amended Petition. Signed by Judge Frank W. Volk on 10/2/2023. (cc: counsel of record; any unrepresented party) (btm)
February 29, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 170 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: The Court ORDERS that the Respondent's 167 Objections to the Magistrate Court's December 2, 2015 Order be OVERRULED, that the Magistrate Judge's 166 Proposed Findings and Recommendation be ADOPTED, an d that the Respondent's 162 Motion to Dismiss, Directed to the District Court, Petitioner's Habeas Petition, as Petitioner is no Longer in State Custody be DENIED; to the extent that Respondent's 167 Objections to the Magistrate Co urt's December 2, 2015 Order was an appeal of the Magistrate Judge's August 4, 2015 136 Order, August 17, 2015 141 Order, and December 2, 2015 165 Order, the Court ORDERS that it be DENIED; the Court ORDERS that this matter is REFERRED to the Honorable Omar J. Aboulhosn for further proceedings. Signed by Judge Irene C. Berger on 2/29/2016. (cc: Magistrate Judge Aboulhosn; attys; any unrepresented party) (slr)
August 17, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 141 ORDER: It is ORDERED that Respondent's 137 MOTION for Reconsideration is DENIED. Signed by Magistrate Judge R. Clarke VanDervort on 8/17/2015. (cc: attys; Petitioner Tony Daughtery) (slr)
November 20, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 117 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: The Court ADOPTS and incorporates herein the findings and recommendation of the Magistrate Judge as contained in the 111 Proposed Findings and Recommendations by Magistrate Judge, and ORDERS that the Respondent 9;s 32 MOTION for summary Judgment be DENIED and that this matter be REFERRED back to Judge VanDervort for further proceedings respecting the merits of the Petitioner's claims. Signed by Judge Irene C. Berger on 11/20/2014. (cc: USMJ VanDervort; attys; any unrepresented party) (msa)
April 18, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 72 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: Petitioner's 59 MOTION for Order Prohibiting Informal Communication by Petitioner's Former Cousel with the W.Va. Attorney General is GRANTED; petitioner's 60 MOTION for for Leave to Conduct Disco very is DENIED. An Evidentiary Hearing is scheduled for Tuesday, 06/04/2013, at 10:30 a.m. in Beckley. Mr. Bruce shall be in attendance and shall have all documents including retainer agreements, letters, receipts, invoices and other evidence germa ne to the issue described herein in his possession. It is ORDERED that the Clerk shall issue a Writ of Habeas Corpus ad Testificandum to the Warden of McDowell County Correctional Center requiring Petitioner to be delivered to the Federal Courthouse in Beckley, West Virginia for the Evidentiary Hearing on 06/04/2013, at 10:30 a.m. Signed by Magistrate Judge R. Clarke VanDervort on 4/18/2013. (cc: attys; B.Bruce; Warden: MCCC, USM, any unrepresented party) (msa)
January 11, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 48 ORDER: It is ORDERED that an Evidentiary Hearing will be conducted on 2/12/2013 at 1:30 PM in Beckley before Magistrate Judge R. Clarke VanDervort. Mr. Barry L. Bruce is directed to be in attendance and have all documents including retainer agreement s, letters, receipts, invoices, and other evidence germane to the issue described herein in his possession; the Court expects that Mr. Bruce will testify. By separate Order, the Court will therefore appoint attorney Thomas J. Gillooly as counsel to r epresent Petitioner at the hearing and in further proceedings as may be appropriate; the Clerk is directed to issue a Writ of Habeas Corpus ad Testificandum for Petitioner requiring that Petitioner be delivered to the Robert C. Byrd United States Cou rthouse and Federal Building, 110 North Heber Street, Beckley, WV on 2/12/2013, in order that he may attend and participate. The Clerk is directed to send a copy of this Order and the Writ of Habeas Corpus ad Testificadum to counsel of record, the Warden of McDowell County Correctional Center, the United States Marshal for the Southern District of West Virginia, and Petitioner. Signed by Magistrate Judge R. Clarke VanDervort on 1/11/2013. (cc: attys; any unrepresented party) (slr)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the West Virginia Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Daugherty v. Huttonsville Correctional Center
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Tony Daugherty
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Huttonsville Correctional Center
Represented By: Silas B. Taylor
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?