DeLoso, et. al. v. Multifresh, Inc.
||Gregorio DeLoso, Shane Duvigneaud and George T. Starr, III
||April 16, 2012
||West Virginia Southern District Court
||Irene C. Berger
|Nature of Suit:
||Fair Labor Standards Act
|Cause of Action:
|Jury Demanded By:
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|Date Filed||#||Document Text|
|May 12, 2014
ORDER: The Court ORDERS that the Plaintiffs' 88 MOTION to Strike Pleadings and Enter Judgment for the Plaintiffs and Plaintiffs' 82 OBJECTION to Discovery Responses Filed by Multifresh in Violation of this Court's Order and Plaint iffs' MOTION to Strike be GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART; the motions are DENIED as to the specific relief sought; to the extent the Plaintiffs seek Rule 37(b) sanctions based on the conduct of Multifresh, the motions are GRANTED; the Cour t ORDERS that SANCTIONS BE IMPOSED against Multifresh in the form of payment of reasonable fees and costs, including attorney's fees, as more fully described herein; Plaintiffs shall file an accounting of their reasonable expenses and attorney's fees with the Court by 5/23/2014. Signed by Judge Irene C. Berger on 5/12/2014. (cc: attys; any unrepresented party) (slr)
|February 4, 2013
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: The Court converts the 6 Motion to a Motion for Summary Judgment and ORDERS that Defendant's 6 MOTION to Dismiss, or in the Alternative, 6 MOTION for Summary Judgment be DENIED; The Court ORDERS that Plaintiffs' 15 MOTION for Conditional Certification and Court-Authorized Notice Pursuant to Section 216(b) of the FLSA be DENIED. Signed by Judge Irene C. Berger on 2/4/2013. (cc: attys; any unrepresented party) (slr)
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the West Virginia Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets were retrieved from PACER, and should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.