McQuerrey v. Applied Bank

Plaintiff: Paul McQuerrey and Kimberly McQuerrey
Defendant: Applied Bank
Case Number: 5:2012cv03637
Filed: July 24, 2012
Court: West Virginia Southern District Court
Office: Beckley Office
County: Raleigh
Presiding Judge: Irene C. Berger
Nature of Suit: Consumer Credit
Cause of Action: 28:1446
Jury Demanded By: Defendant

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the West Virginia Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: McQuerrey v. Applied Bank
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Paul McQuerrey
Represented By: Ralph C. Young
Represented By: Christopher B. Frost
Represented By: Steven R. Broadwater
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Kimberly McQuerrey
Represented By: Steven R. Broadwater
Represented By: Christopher B. Frost
Represented By: Ralph C. Young
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Applied Bank
Represented By: Joshua Verdi
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets were retrieved from PACER, and should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.