Minter v. Ziegler
Petitioner: Maurice Minter
Respondent: Joel Ziegler
Case Number: 5:2013cv24164
Filed: October 1, 2013
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia
Office: Beckley Office
County: Kanawha
Presiding Judge: Thomas E. Johnston
Presiding Judge: Dwane L. Tinsley
Nature of Suit: General
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
April 8, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 7 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: The Court ADOPTS the 6 Proposed Findings and Recommendation by Magistrate Judge, DISMISSES WITHOUT PREJUDICE the 1 Petition, and DIRECTS the Clerk to remove this case from the Court's docket. Signed by Judge Thomas E. Johnston on 4/8/2014. (cc: attys; any unrepresented party) (slr)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the West Virginia Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Minter v. Ziegler
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Joel Ziegler
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Maurice Minter
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?