Frisbie v. Rite Aid Corporation

Frisbie v. Rite Aid Corporation

Plaintiff:	Larry Dean Frisbie, Jr.
Defendant:	Rite Aid Corporation
Case Number:	5:2014cv03836
Filed:	January 22, 2014
Court:	US District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia
Office:	Beckley Office
County:	Raleigh
Presiding Judge:	Irene C. Berger
Nature of Suit:	Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jury Demanded By:	Plaintiff

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
December 2, 2014	Filing 17 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: Wherefore, after careful consideration and based on the findings herein, the Court ORDERS that the Defendant's 15 MOTION for Summary Judgment be GRANTED. The Court further ORDERS that this matter be DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE and REMOVED from the Court's docket. Signed by Judge Irene C. Berger on 12/2/2014. (cc: attys; any unrepresented party) (msa)
April 30, 2014	Filing 10 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: Wherefore, after careful consideration and based on the findings herein, the Court does hereby ORDER that the Defendant's 3 MOTION to Dismiss, or in the Alternative, for Summary Judgment be DENIED in part and GR ANTED in part. The Court specifically ORDERS that the claims contained in Counts III and IV be DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE, and that the claims contained in Counts I and II remain pending. Signed by Judge Irene C. Berger on 4/30/2014. (cc: attys; any unrepresented party) (msa)

Date Filed

Document Text

December 2, 2014

Filing 17 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: Wherefore, after careful consideration and based on the findings herein, the Court ORDERS that the Defendant's 15 MOTION for Summary Judgment be GRANTED. The Court further ORDERS that this matter be DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE and REMOVED from the Court's docket. Signed by Judge Irene C. Berger on 12/2/2014. (cc: attys; any unrepresented party) (msa)

April 30, 2014

Filing 10 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: Wherefore, after careful consideration and based on the findings herein, the Court does hereby ORDER that the Defendant's 3 MOTION to Dismiss, or in the Alternative, for Summary Judgment be DENIED in part and GR ANTED in part. The Court specifically ORDERS that the claims contained in Counts III and IV be DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE, and that the claims contained in Counts I and II remain pending. Signed by Judge Irene C. Berger on 4/30/2014. (cc: attys; any unrepresented party) (msa)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the West Virginia Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Frisbie v. Rite Aid Corporation
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Rite Aid Corporation
Represented By:	Brian J. Moore
Represented By:	Mark A. Carter
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Larry Dean Frisbie, Jr.
Represented By:	Thomas K. Patterson
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?