Santillana v. Collins

Santillana v. Collins

Plaintiff:	Santiago Santillana
Defendant:	Mark Collins
Case Number:	5:2014cv12474
Filed:	March 17, 2014
Court:	US District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia
Office:	Beckley Office
County:	Raleigh
Presiding Judge:	Irene C. Berger
Presiding Judge:	Cheryl A. Eifert
Nature of Suit:	General
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 2241
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
February 26, 2015	Filing 28 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: The Court ORDERS that the Magistrate Judge's 23 Proposed Findings and Recommendation be ADOPTED, that Petitioner's 27 Traverse Brief Setting Forth Meritorious Objections to the Proposed Findings and Recomme ndations of United States Magistrate Judge Cheryl A. Eifert Recommending the United States District Court Deny Petitioner's Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus and Further Deny Petitioner's Motion Requesting Summary Judgment be OVERRULED, and that Petitioner's 2 Application Under 28 U.S.C. Section 2241 for Writ of Habeas Corpus By a Person in State or Federal Custody be DENIED; the Court ORDERS that the Petitioner's 9 Motion for Summary Judgment Pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 56(a)(c)(d) be DENIED and that the Respondent's Motion 10 Motion to Dismiss or Transfer be GRANTED to the extent it seeks dismissal; the Court ORDERS that this matter be STRICKEN from the docket. Signed by Judge Irene C. Berger on 2/26/2015. (cc: Magistrate Judge Eifert; attys; any unrepresented party) (slr)

Date Filed

Document Text

February 26, 2015

Filing 28 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: The Court ORDERS that the Magistrate Judge's 23 Proposed Findings and Recommendation be ADOPTED, that Petitioner's 27 Traverse Brief Setting Forth Meritorious Objections to the Proposed Findings and Recomme ndations of United States Magistrate Judge Cheryl A. Eifert Recommending the United States District Court Deny Petitioner's Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus and Further Deny Petitioner's Motion Requesting Summary Judgment be OVERRULED, and that Petitioner's 2 Application Under 28 U.S.C. Section 2241 for Writ of Habeas Corpus By a Person in State or Federal Custody be DENIED; the Court ORDERS that the Petitioner's 9 Motion for Summary Judgment Pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 56(a)(c)(d) be DENIED and that the Respondent's Motion 10 Motion to Dismiss or Transfer be GRANTED to the extent it seeks dismissal; the Court ORDERS that this matter be STRICKEN from the docket. Signed by Judge Irene C. Berger on 2/26/2015. (cc: Magistrate Judge Eifert; attys; any unrepresented party) (slr)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the West Virginia Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Santillana v. Collins
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Santiago Santillana
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Mark Collins
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?