Rex v. West Virginia School of Osteopathic Medicine
| Nicole Rex |
| West Virginia School of Osteopathic Medicine, Michael Adelman, Leslie Bicksler, Elaine Soper and Jeffrey Shawver |
| 5:2015cv01017 |
| January 23, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia |
| Beckley Office |
| Greenbrier |
| Irene C. Berger |
| Civil Rights: Education |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
126
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: That the 112 MOTION for Entry of Summary Judgment on Behalf of Defendant West Virginia School of Osteopathic Medicine be DENIED and that the Defendant's 100 MOTION for Summary Judgment be GRANTED and all pending motions be TERMINATED AS MOOT. Signed by Judge Irene C. Berger on 04/12/2017. (cc: attys; any unrepresented party) (msa)
|
|
Filing
30
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: The Court ORDERS that the 12 MOTION of Defendant West Virginia School of Osteopathic Medicine be GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART; specifically, the 12 Motion is GRANTED as to Counts 5, 6, 7, and 10 and DENIED as t o Counts 1, 2, 8, 9, 11 and 12; the Court ORDERS that Defendants Michael Adelman, Leslie Bicksler and Elaine Soper's 16 MOTION to Dismiss be DENIED, except that the 16 Motion is GRANTED as to Count 4 for the Defendants in their official capacities to the extent the Plaintiff seeks non-injunctive relief. Signed by Judge Irene C. Berger on 8/11/2015. (cc: attys; any unrepresented party) (slr)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
