Altamirano v. Chemical Safety and Hazard Investigation Board

Defendant: Chemical Safety and Hazard Investigation Board
Plaintiff: Francisco Altamirano
Case Number: 6:2013mc00096
Filed: August 16, 2013
Court: West Virginia Southern District Court
Office: Parkersburg Office
County: Wood
Nature of Suit: Other
Cause of Action: Foreign Deposition

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
November 19, 2013 9 Opinion or Order of the Court MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER denying Plaintiff's 5 MOTION for Sanctions. Signed by Magistrate Judge Cheryl A. Eifert on 11/19/2013. (cc: attys; any unrepresented party) (jkk)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the West Virginia Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Altamirano v. Chemical Safety and Hazard Investigation Board
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Chemical Safety and Hazard Investigation Board
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Francisco Altamirano
Represented By: Barry Douglas Roseman(Designation Retained)
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets were retrieved from PACER, and should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.