Cases 1 - 10 of 49,476
Jones (ID 98286) v. Langford
as 5:2024cv03065
Petitioner:
Austin Jones
Respondent:
Donald Langford
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
McShan v. USP Leavenworth
as 5:2024cv03066
Plaintiff:
Jamal Jawon McShan
Defendant:
USP Leavenworth
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Davison v. Smith et al
as 5:2024cv00483
Plaintiff:
Alonzo Gabriel Davison
Defendant:
Clifford J Smith, Scott Rowland, Robert L Hudson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mays v. Tafoya
as 1:2024cv00460
Plaintiff:
Joseph Mays
Defendant:
Alisha Tafoya
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hoffman et al v. State of New Mexico Parole Board
as 1:2024cv00457
Plaintiff:
Zachary Hoffman, David T. Hernandez, Randy Lopez and others
Defendant:
State of New Mexico Parole Board
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rodriguez v. Tafoya et al
as 1:2024cv00461
Plaintiff:
Christopher Rodriguez
Defendant:
Alisha Tafoya, GCCF Staff and New Mexico State Parole Board
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis v. Warden
as 5:2024cv00486
Petitioner:
DeMaurea Davis
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Smith v. Wright
as 5:2024cv00482
Plaintiff:
Jason Michael Smith
Defendant:
FNU Wright
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ortiz v. Tafoya et al
as 1:2024cv00458
Plaintiff:
George Ortiz
Defendant:
Alisha Tafoya, New Mexico State Parole Board, FNU Wilkins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lombard-Jackson (PS) v. Johnson et al
as 1:2024cv01312
Plaintiff:
Kiki Lombard-Jackson
Defendant:
Jeanna Johnson, SS Commission LDEF, Sawaya and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
