Civil Rights Cases filed in the D.C. Circuit Courts
Cases 31 - 40 of 12,406
IGOREVICH v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2024cv01317
Plaintiff: SIVOKONEV PAVEL IGOREVICH
Defendant: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
K.P. et al v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA et al
as 1:2024cv01325
Plaintiff: K.P. and Kia Pollard
Defendant: DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, Archie Brawner, Alison Bull and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
DANTZLER v. FOSTER et al
as 1:2024cv01322
Plaintiff: OSCAR DANTZLER
Defendant: CHARLOTTE H. FOSTER and WILLIAMS DYKES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
VERMA v. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY et al
as 1:2024cv01330
Plaintiff: ANAND VERMA
Defendant: DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY and UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Adaeze Nwosu v. Dabney Friedrich, et al
as 24-5124
Plaintiff: Adaeze Nwosu
Defendant: Dabney L. Friedrich, Judge and Michelle Grady
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-5125
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Type: Civil Rights Jobs
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01306
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01290
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
HARO v. STARK
as 1:2024cv01294
Plaintiff: ABIGAIL HARO
Defendant: ALAN M. STARK
Cross Defendant: KEVIN B. PIERCY, TAYLOR R. EALAND, JAMES D. MILLER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
BAALIM v. WASHINGTON PASSPORT AGENCY et al
as 1:2024cv01338
Plaintiff: MALAK BAALIM
Defendant: WASHINGTON PASSPORT AGENCY, BRANDY, SHERIKA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?