Cases 11 - 20 of 59,128
Brazier v. BRHPAN II-GEORGIA LLC
as 3:2024cv00327
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Brazier
Defendant:
BRHPAN II-GEORGIA LLC doing business as Panera Bread
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Johnston v. Unifund CCR Partners
as 5:2024cv00140
Plaintiff:
Gerald Kemp Johnston
Defendant:
Unifund CCR Partners
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Blohm v. CMH Homes, Inc. et al
as 0:2024cv00057
Plaintiff:
Alyssa Blohm
Defendant:
CMH Homes, Inc. doing business as Clayton Homes #46 and Clayton Homes, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Account Receivable
Williams et al v. United States of America
as 5:2024cv00139
Plaintiff:
Sandra Williams and Gregory Williams
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Hooker v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 5:2024cv00101
Plaintiff:
Natalie Hooker
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00314
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 cra Removal - Fair Credit Reporting Act
In Re Attorney Admission for Matthew Isaac Boggs
as 5:2024aa00060
Not Yet Classified:
Attorney Admission Application
Beneke Holdings LLC v. Federal Insurance Company
as 3:2024cv00310
Plaintiff:
Beneke Holdings LLC
Defendant:
Federal Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
Miller v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 4:2024cv00052
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey L. Miller
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00311
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
