Cases 1 - 10 of 7,204
Serrano v. Diperna et al
as 1:2024cv00483
Plaintiff:
Louis E. Serrano, III
Defendant:
Anthony Diperna and Charles A. Schiano, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Herbert v. Raczkowski et al
as 1:2024cv00485
Plaintiff:
Jeremiah Folsom Herbert
Defendant:
Deputy Superindent E. Raczkowski, Sergeant W. Tomporowski, Sergeant A.J. Holman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McLaughin v. Livingston County PD et al
as 6:2024cv06314
Plaintiff:
Casey McLaughin, Sr.
Defendant:
Livingston County PD and L. Babeswski Laslo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Torres v. Titus
as 6:2024cv06305
Petitioner:
Jose L. Torres
Respondent:
Superintendent A. Titus
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Johnson v. Tenorio et al
as 6:2024cv06301
Plaintiff:
Jabari J. Johnson
Defendant:
Major Christopher Tenorio and HSA Geoffrey Calloway
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McLaughin v. Mount Morris PD et al
as 6:2024cv06302
Plaintiff:
Casey Joel McLaughin, Sr.
Defendant:
Mount Morris PD, Mathew Roegner, Ronald Huff and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bennett v. Lander et al
as 6:2024cv06296
Plaintiff:
Joshua Bennett
Defendant:
Officer Lander, Officer Ferguson, Officer McClellan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mosby v. Miller
as 6:2024cv06291
Petitioner:
Marcus Mosby
Respondent:
Supt. Mark Miller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Clavijo v. Wolcott
as 6:2024cv06288
Petitioner:
Joel Clavijo
Respondent:
Julie Wolcott
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Elfgeeh v. USA
as 6:2024cv06283
Petitioner:
Mufid A Elfgeeh
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
