Cases 1 - 10 of 3,085
Johnson v. USA
as 4:2009cv00252
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Richard Jay Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2009cv00251
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Shartzer v. State of Oklahoma et al
as 6:2009cv00167
Plaintiff:
Todd M. Shartzer
Defendant:
State of Oklahoma, Brad Henry, Drew Edmondson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kinkead v. Standifird
as 4:2009cv00247
Petitioner:
Mark Alex Kinkead
Respondent:
Jane Standifird
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Chadwick v. Province
as 6:2009cv00168
Petitioner:
Gerald W. Chadwick
Respondent:
Greg Province
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Parks v. Cornell Corrections of Oklahoma
as 5:2009cv00450
Plaintiff:
Edward Faye Parks
Defendant:
Cornell Corrections of Oklahoma
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fennell v. Jones et al
as 5:2009cv00449
Petitioner:
Louis W Fennell
Respondent:
Justin Jones, Bobby Boone and J D Daniels
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jackson v. Workman et al
as 6:2009cv00166
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel Jackson
Defendant:
Randy Workman, Justin Jones, Harry Reading and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wood v. Anthony et al
as 6:2009cv00165
Plaintiff:
Rodney Aaron Wood
Defendant:
Milton Anthony, Steven Hutchinson, Kim Miller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Oldham v. Taylor et al
as 4:2009cv00243
Petitioner:
Delbert Leroy Oldham
Respondent:
Joseph Taylor and Drew Edmondson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
