Cases 1 - 10 of 3,086
DOG-ON-IT PARKS, INC. v. Midwest Grooming Supplies & Service Corporation
as 2:2024cv00767
Plaintiff:
DOG-ON-IT PARKS, INC.
Defendant:
Midwest Grooming Supplies & Service Corporation
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
RBW Studio LLC v. Weinstein AU PLLC et al
as 2:2024cv00763
Plaintiff:
RBW Studio, LLC
Defendant:
Weinstein AU, PLLC, The Rushing Company, L.L.C., Eitel Associates, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338 Patent Infringement
Virtual Creative Artists LLC v. Valve Corporation
as 2:2024cv00749
Plaintiff:
Virtual Creative Artists, Llc
Defendant:
Valve Corporation
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126 Patent Infringement
Pointwise Ventures LLC v. Amazon.com Inc
as 2:2024cv00751
Plaintiff:
Pointwise Ventures Llc,
Defendant:
Amazon.com Inc
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126 Patent Infringement
Denneroll Holdings Pty Limited et al v. Chirolux LLC
as 2:2024cv00176
Plaintiff:
Denneroll Holdings Pty Limited and Denneroll Industries International Pty Limited
Defendant:
ChiroLux LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Polaris Images Corp v. Microsoft Corporation
as 2:2024cv00702
Plaintiff:
Polaris Images Corp
Defendant:
Microsoft Corporation
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
McGlynn v. Giant Freakin Robot LLC
as 3:2024cv05385
Plaintiff:
David McGlynn
Defendant:
Giant Freakin Robot LLC
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Yang v. News Anchored LLC
as 2:2024cv00166
Plaintiff:
Stephen Yang
Defendant:
News Anchored LLC
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Voltstar Technologies Inc v. Tozo Inc
as 2:2024cv00673
Plaintiff:
Voltstar Technologies, Inc.
Defendant:
Tozo Inc
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Nightingale v Kottkamp Yedinak & Esworthy PLLC
as 2:2024cv00159
Plaintiff:
David Nightingale
Defendant:
Kottkamp, Yedinak & Esworthy, PLLC
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
