Cases 1 - 10 of 1,679
Hanley v. The Kroger Co. et al
as 3:2024cv01197
Plaintiff:
Melandi Hanley
Defendant:
The Kroger Co. and Kroger Loyalty Fulfillment Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Pintor v. US Foods, Inc.
as 5:2024cv00120
Plaintiff:
Christian R. Pintor
Defendant:
US Foods, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Merrill v. McKinney Independent School District et al
as 4:2024cv00442
Plaintiff:
Kalei Merrill
Defendant:
Mitchell Curry, Melinda Defelice, Tamaria Griffin and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Calla v. Ortiz et al
as 3:2024cv00159
Plaintiff:
Mr Anthony Nicolas Calla
Defendant:
Mr. Isaac Ortiz and Ms. Maryne P Hernandez
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0141 Labor Management Relations Act of 1947
Sanchez et al v. City of Corpus Christi, Texas
as 2:2024cv00106
Plaintiff:
Teofilo Sanchez, Amanda Guerra and Cody Scott
Defendant:
City of Corpus Christi, Texas
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Galia v. Roundglass, LLC
as 1:2024cv00468
Plaintiff:
Erica Galia
Defendant:
Roundglass, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Cristo v. DoorDash, Inc.
as 5:2024cv00446
Plaintiff:
Cassandra Cristo
Defendant:
DoorDash, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704 Labor Litigation
Mustafa v. Prosegur Services Group Inc. et al
as 4:2024cv00375
Plaintiff:
Najla Mustafa
Defendant:
Prosegur Services Group, Inc. and Prosegur Security USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
De Santiago v. Shutterfly Lifetouch, LLC
as 3:2024cv00144
Plaintiff:
Presiphanie L. De Santiago
Defendant:
Shutterfly Lifetouch, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Bryant v. Texas City ISD
as 3:2024cv00116
Plaintiff:
Larry Bryant
Defendant:
Texas City ISD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
