Cases 11 - 20 of 45
King v. Aramark Correctional Services et al
as 2:2023cv00156
Defendant:
John Doe, Jane Doe, Aramark Correctional Services and others
Plaintiff:
Lance King
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Burke v. Aramark Correctional Services et al
as 2:2022cv04421
Defendant:
Jane/John Doe, Jane Doe, John Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Norman Burke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Woods v. Aramark Correctional Services et al
as 2:2022cv04420
Defendant:
Jane Doe, John Doe, Aramark Correctional Services and others
Plaintiff:
Franklin Woods
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Boyd v. Mick et al
as 2:2022cv03492
Plaintiff:
John A Boyd
Defendant:
Kimberly Mick and Aramark Corporation
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Helms v. Aramark Correctional Services, LLC
as 3:2022cv01557
Plaintiff:
State and Taran Helms
Defendant:
Aramark Correctional Services, LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rice v. Aramark Services, Inc.
as 1:2022cv01545
Plaintiff:
LaTrecha Rice
Defendant:
Aramark Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Johnson v. Richland County Jail et al
as 1:2022cv00910
Plaintiff:
Robert W. Johnson
Defendant:
Richland County Jail, Christopher Blunk, James Myers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Leach v. State of Ohio et al
as 3:2022cv00528
Plaintiff:
Anthony S. Leach
Defendant:
State of Ohio, Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Correction, Marion Correctional Institution and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kovacic v. Aramark Correctional Service LLC et al
as 1:2021cv02042
Plaintiff:
Holly Kovacic
Defendant:
Aramark Correctional Service LLC, Warden Charmaine Bracy, Brandon Kohler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hope v. Berg et al
as 5:2021cv01308
Plaintiff:
Valerie Hope
Defendant:
Angela Berg, Stephanie Bowens, Rebecca McCutcheon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
