Cases 31 - 40 of 20,096
Smith v. Brazzle et al
as 4:2024cv00047
Plaintiff:
Daniel Smith
Defendant:
Andre Charles Brazzle, Andre Charles Brazzle of Brazzle Constable Service and County of Washington
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rich (PS) v. Feyan et al
as 1:2024cv01496
Plaintiff:
Jordan Rich
Defendant:
John Feyan, Jessica L. Kern, John P. Martens and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Schafer v. Nequette et al
as 1:2024cv01503
Plaintiff:
Julie Schafer
Defendant:
Nikolette Nequette, Tim Janda, The Board of County Commissioners of Mesa County, Colorado and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Birchfield v. Mulkey et al
as 4:2024cv00256
Plaintiff:
Michael Birchfield, II
Defendant:
Dylan Mulkey, Alex Wilson and Tim Tipton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Holz v. Littel
as 5:2024cv00537
Plaintiff:
Timothy Edward Holz
Defendant:
Glenn Littel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Holz v. Shartel Towers Apartments The
as 5:2024cv00535
Plaintiff:
Timothy E Holz
Defendant:
Shartel Towers Apartments The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Jackson v. Burris
as 5:2024cv00539
Plaintiff:
LaTia Jackson
Defendant:
Keegan Burris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Holz v. LNU
as 5:2024cv00536
Plaintiff:
Timothy Edward Holz
Defendant:
Phillip LNU
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Herbel et al v. Marion, Kansas, City of et al
as 2:2024cv02224
Plaintiff:
Ruth Herbel and Ronald Herbel
Defendant:
Marion, Kansas, City of, David Mayfield, Gideon Cody and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Bivings (PS) v. Arapahoe Department of Human Services
as 1:2024cv01519
Plaintiff:
Kayla S. Bivings
Defendant:
Arapahoe Department of Human Services
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
