Personal Injury: Health Care Cases filed in the Sixth Circuit Courts
Cases 21 - 30 of 29,322
Hamilton et al v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv03070
Plaintiff: Betty Gayle Hamilton and James L Hamilton, Jr.
Defendant: C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Krause v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv03064
Plaintiff: Jason Krause
Defendant: C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
McClure v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv03065
Plaintiff: Thomas McClure
Defendant: C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Meza v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv03066
Plaintiff: Edgar Meza
Defendant: C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Nye v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv03067
Plaintiff: Dustin Nye
Defendant: C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Edwards v. C.R. Bard Inc et al
as 2:2024cv03071
Plaintiff: Curtis Edwards
Defendant: C.R. Bard Inc and Davol Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Glomb v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv03042
Plaintiff: Robert Glomb
Defendant: Davol Inc and C.R Bard Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Nicholas v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv03043
Plaintiff: Walter Nicholas
Defendant: C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Burnett v. Novo Nordisk A/S et al
as 5:2024cv00107
Plaintiff: Amy Burnett
Defendant: Novo Nordisk A/S, Novo Nordisk North America Operations A/S, Novo Nordisk US Holdings Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
North v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv03046
Plaintiff: Christopher North
Defendant: C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?