Cases 61 - 70 of 956
Caplan v. FASHION CLEANERS, INC.
as 0:2019cv60535
Plaintiff:
Howard Michael Caplan
Defendant:
FASHION CLEANERS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182
Caplan v. 6675 PEMBROKE TIRE COMPANY, INC. et al
as 0:2019cv60449
Plaintiff:
Howard Michael Caplan
Defendant:
7685 PINES, LLC and 6675 PEMBROKE TIRE COMPANY, INC.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2019cv60425
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 9:2019cv80166
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182
Caplan v. ACTUAL GAS STATION & AUTO REPAIRS CORP. et al
as 0:2019cv60192
Plaintiff:
Howard Michael Caplan
Defendant:
ACTUAL HOLDINGS INC., ACTUAL GAS STATION & AUTO REPAIRS CORP. and HALLANDALE PETROLEUM INC.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182
Caplan v. HARRY P. STAMPLER, INC. et al
as 0:2019cv60091
Plaintiff:
Howard Michael Caplan
Defendant:
HARRY P. STAMPLER, INC., MICHEL SHLIMOWITZ and HARRY P. STAMPLER, INC. a Florida Profit Corporation doing business as STAMPLER AUCTIONS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2019cv60070
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Caplan v. GLOBAL RECOGNITION ENTERPRISES, INC. et al
as 0:2019cv60038
Defendant:
1517 ADAMS STREET LLC, GLOBAL RECOGNITION ENTERPRISES, INC. and GLOBAL RECOGNITION ENTERPRISES, INC. a Florida Profit Corporation doing business as BRAVO AWARDS
Plaintiff:
Howard Michael Caplan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2018cv63026
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2018cv62997
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
