Other Statutes Cases filed in the US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana Before Judge Joseph Van Bokkelen
Cases 31 - 40 of 207
Wang v. Endocyte Inc et al
as 4:2018cv00085
Defendant: Dawn Svoronos, Marc Kozin, Philip S Low PhD and others
Plaintiff: Elaine Wang
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2018cv00081
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Benton County v. Purdue Pharma LP
as 4:2018cv00074
Defendant: MCKESSON CORPORATION, PURDUE PHARMA L.P., MALLINCKRODT LLC and others
Plaintiff: BENTON COUNTY
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv00370
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv00344
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2018cv00066
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv00321
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
George v. Product Slingshot, Inc. et al
as 2:2018cv00296
Defendant: John Does 1-10, Think 3D/Prelude, Inc. and Product Slingshot, Inc.
Plaintiff: Dr. David George and Dr David George
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2018cv00049
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Nicholson et al v. Gary City of et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2018cv00257
Plaintiff: Douglas Grimes, Jeff Nicholson, Greg Serbon and others
Defendant: Herbert Jr Smith, Lavetta Sparks-Wade, Carolyn D Rogers and others
Intervenor: Indiana State of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?