Strunk v. Burke Costanza and Carberry LLP
| Andrew Strunk |
| Burke Costanza & Carberry LLP and Burke Costanza and Carberry LLP |
| 2:2018cv00344 |
| September 13, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana |
| Joseph S Van Bokkelen |
| Andrew P Rodovich |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 6, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 15 ANSWER to #1 Complaint and Jury Demand by Burke Costanza and Carberry LLP.(Stein, Brandon) |
| Filing 14 MAGISTRATE JUDGE CONSENT FORMS sent to all parties (Standard Track). Magistrate Consent forms due by 11/23/2018. (tc) |
Filing 13
ORDER AND NOTICE OF HEARING: In Person Rule 16 Preliminary Pretrial Conference set for 11/30/2018 09:30 AM in US District Court - Hammond before Magistrate Judge Andrew P Rodovich. A proposed Discovery Plan under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(f) to be filed no later than five (5) business days prior to the pretrial conference. Signed by Magistrate Judge Andrew P Rodovich on 11/1/2018. (tc)
|
|
Filing 12
MINUTE ORDER: Each party and each attorney in this case shall take reasonable steps to preserve electronically stored information (ESI) that is relevant to any claim or defense in this case, whether or not the information is admissible at trial. This requirement relates back to the point in time when the party or attorney reasonably anticipated litigation about these matters. Text entry order. By Magistrate Judge Andrew P Rodovich on 10/9/2018. (tc)
|
| Set/Reset Deadlines: Answer due 11/6/18 (kjp) |
| Filing 11 NOTICE of Appearance by Jennifer J Kalas on behalf of Burke Costanza and Carberry LLP (Kalas, Jennifer) |
| Filing 10 NOTICE of Appearance by David M Schultz on behalf of Burke Costanza and Carberry LLP (Schultz, David) |
| Filing 9 LOCAL RULE 6.1 NOTICE OF AUTOMATIC INITIAL EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE A RESPONSIVE PLEADING TO THE COMPLAINT. Responsive pleading due 11/6/18. (Stein, Brandon) Modified dkt text on 10/10/2018 (kjp). |
| Filing 8 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Burke Costanza and Carberry LLP. (Stein, Brandon) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Brandon S Stein on behalf of Burke Costanza and Carberry LLP (Stein, Brandon) |
| Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Andrew Strunk. Burke Costanza and Carberry LLP served on 9/17/2018, answer due 10/9/2018. (Edelman, Daniel) |
| Filing 5 Summons Issued as to Burke Costanza and Carberry LLP. NOTE:The attached document is accessible by court personnel only. Summons forms that were electronically submitted to the court for issuance will be returned to counsel via e-mail. (sct) |
| Judge Joseph S Van Bokkelen added. Senior Judge James T Moody no longer assigned to case. (sct) |
| Senior Judge James T Moody and Magistrate Judge Andrew P Rodovich added. (New Case) (sct) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Heather A Kolbus on behalf of Andrew Strunk (Kolbus, Heather) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by Cathleen M Combs on behalf of Andrew Strunk (Combs, Cathleen) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by Daniel A Edelman on behalf of Andrew Strunk (Edelman, Daniel) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Burke Costanza & Carberry LLP( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0755-3679046.), filed by Andrew Strunk. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Proposed Summons)(Edelman, Daniel) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
