Cases 11 - 20 of 546
McNeil v. Watts
as 2:2024cv00114
Plaintiff:
Mickel McNeil and Mickel J. McNeil
Defendant:
Watts
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McNeil v. Watts et al
as 3:2024cv00292
Plaintiff:
Mickel McNeil and Mickel J. McNeil
Defendant:
Watts, G- Lewis, Farley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Martin v. Warden
as 2:2024cv00092
Petitioner:
Rhett A Martin
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Carter v. Warden
as 1:2024cv00105
Petitioner:
Michael D. Carter, Jr.
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Carter v. Warden
as 3:2024cv00212
Petitioner:
Michael D. Carter, Jr.
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Myers v. Banic et al
as 3:2024cv00109
Plaintiff:
Michael Myers and Michael R Myers, Jr
Defendant:
Banic and Laporte Co Sherriffs Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Simbeck v. Elkhart County, IN et al
as 1:2024cv00033
Plaintiff:
Rocky Dwight Simbeck
Defendant:
Elkhart County, IN, Elkhart County Courts, Gretchen S Lund and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Simbeck v. Elkhart County, IN et al
as 3:2024cv00089
Plaintiff:
Rocky Dwight Simbeck
Defendant:
Elkhart County, IN, Elkhart County Courts, Gretchen S Lund and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chandler v. Valois
as 3:2024cv00080
Plaintiff:
Mark Chandler
Defendant:
Valois
Not Yet Classified:
INDIANA STATE PRISON E-FILE (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ledford v. Centurion et al
as 3:2024cv00077
Plaintiff:
Michael L Ledford
Defendant:
Centurion, Johnson and Miller
Not Yet Classified:
MIAMI E-FILE(Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
