Other Statutes Cases filed in the US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana Before Judge Sarah Barker
Cases 1 - 10 of 1,370
THOMAS ROEHRMAN V. LEADSMARKET.COM, LLC, MARKETING LABS LLC and NESMETAJU, LLC
as 1:2024cv00682
Plaintiff: Thomas Roehrman
Defendant: Leadsmarket.com, Marketing Labs, LLC and Nesmetaju, LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00637
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00576
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
SIGNUM, LLC et al v. INDIANAPOLIS ORGANIC LAWN CARE, INC. et al
as 1:2024cv00541
Plaintiff: SIGNUM, LLC and NATURALAWN OF AMERICA, INC.
Defendant: INDIANAPOLIS ORGANIC LAWN CARE, INC., DONALD HARVEY, DEBORAH CASEY-HARVEY and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00048
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00428
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00397
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00385
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
ANDRES et al v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 4:2024cv00038
Plaintiff: GREG ANDRES and PAULA ANDRES
Defendant: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00318
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?