Cases 11 - 20 of 64
POFF v. BR ASSOCIATES, INC.
as 2:2009cv00260
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY M. POFF
Defendant:
BR ASSOCIATES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
CRANK et al VS K2 DRYWALL INC. ET AL
as 2:2009cv00253
Plaintiff:
PAUL CRANK, PAUL CRANK, GENE GLASGOW and others
Defendant:
K2 DRYWALL INC. and GREGORY H. KELLY
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
DAYHUFF v. THE EDGAR COUNTY BANK AND TRUST CO.
as 2:2009cv00233
Plaintiff:
DANIEL DAYHUFF and DANIEL DAYHUFF
Defendant:
THE EDGAR COUNTY BANK AND TRUST CO.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
DECKER v. EDGAR COUNTY BANK AND TRUST CO
as 2:2009cv00216
Plaintiff:
MICHELLE DECKER
Defendant:
EDGAR COUNTY BANK AND TRUST CO
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
DITTO v. MILLER BUSINESS SOLUTIONS INC
as 2:2009cv00192
Plaintiff:
ROBERT MICHAEL DITTO
Defendant:
MILLER BUSINESS SOLUTIONS INC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
HAMILTON v. HOMETOWN SONIC, LLC
as 4:2009cv00071
Plaintiff:
DONNA HAMILTON and DONNA HAMILTON
Defendant:
HOMETOWN SONIC, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
ROBERTSON v. ZACHRY CONSTRUCTION
as 2:2009cv00141
Plaintiff:
DAWN M ROBERTSON
Defendant:
ZACHRY CONSTRUCTION
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
SMALLWOOD v. TRANS-CARE, INC.
as 2:2009cv00134
Plaintiff:
AMANDA SMALLWOOD
Defendant:
TRANS-CARE, INC.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
GIBSON v. MEDICAL COSMETIC CENTER, LLC et al
as 3:2009cv00036
Plaintiff:
MARQUETTA J. GIBSON
Defendant:
MEDICAL COSMETIC CENTER, LLC, EVANSVILLE MEDICAL GROUP, LLC and THOMAS S. HASTETTER
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
ASAY-DEAN v. MEDICAL COSMETIC CENTER, LLC et al
as 3:2009cv00032
Plaintiff:
SHERRY ROBIN ASAY-DEAN
Defendant:
MEDICAL COSMETIC CENTER, LLC, EVANSVILLE MEDICAL GROUP, LLC and THOMAS S. HASTETTER
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
