Cases 51 - 60 of 301
LYNN v. POPPE et al
as 4:2009cv00036
Plaintiff:
ROBERT LYNN
Defendant:
HANS G. POPPE, DIGITAL LIFESTYLES, LLC and ANTHONY T. ROSSINI
Cause Of Action: Diversity
PROGRESSIVE CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY v. K.S. et al
as 4:2009cv00034
Plaintiff:
PROGRESSIVE CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY
Defendant:
K.S., TRICIA STAHL, MEGAN DEAN and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
KEY ELECTRONICS, INC. v. AIROCARE, INC.
as 4:2009cv00033
Plaintiff:
KEY ELECTRONICS, INC.
Defendant:
AIROCARE, INC.
Cause Of Action: Diversity
AKERS et al v. STATE FARM FIRE AND CASUALTY COMPANY
as 2:2009cv00083
Plaintiff:
KEVIN AKERS, KEVIN AKERS, KRIS JANSEN and others
Defendant:
STATE FARM FIRE AND CASUALTY COMPANY and STATE FARM FIRE AND CASUALTY COMPANY
Cause Of Action: Diversity
ENGEBRETSON v. SUN LIFE ASSURANCE COMPANY OF CANADA
as 4:2009cv00026
Plaintiff:
KATHLEEN ENGEBRETSON and KATHLEEN ENGEBRETSON
Defendant:
SUN LIFE ASSURANCE COMPANY OF CANADA and SUN LIFE ASSURANCE COMPANY OF CANADA
Cause Of Action: Diversity
MOORE v. UNUM LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA
as 2:2009cv00072
Plaintiff:
CINDA MOORE
Defendant:
UNUM LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA and UNUM LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2009cv00023
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Plaintiff
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2009cv00024
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Plaintiff
PEKIN INSURANCE COMPANY v. TRUGAN QUALITY CONSTRUCTION, INC. et al
as 3:2009cv00022
Plaintiff:
PEKIN INSURANCE COMPANY
Defendant:
TRUGAN QUALITY CONSTRUCTION, INC., DANIEL M. TOPPER, MICHAEL SCHNELL and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2009cv00020
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Plaintiff
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
