Other Statutes Cases filed in the US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri
Cases 1 - 10 of 5,587
Miller v. Miller
as 4:2024cv00785
Plaintiff: Matthew W. Miller
Defendant: Lynn A. Miller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00104
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Hudson v. Capital Vacations, LLC
as 4:2024cv00757
Plaintiff: Joseph Hudson
Defendant: Capital Vacations, LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00101
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
BNSF Railway Company v. Beaulieu et al
as 2:2024cv00041
Plaintiff: BNSF Railway Company
Defendant: Pierson Beaulieu, Dustin Boyd, Wendy Burkett and others
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 1 U.S. Arbitration Act
United States of America v. Askins et al
as 4:2024cv00729
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: Orlando Askins, The Askins Development Group, LLC and Shaw Holding Group LLC
5 Star Market, Inc. et al v. United States of America
as 4:2024cv00721
Plaintiff: 5 Star Market, Inc. a Missouri Corporation doing business as 5 Star Market and Nader Abdesumad
Defendant: United States of America
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00685
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Miller v. Schelp We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2024cv00674
Plaintiff: Matthew W. Miller
Defendant: Matthew T. Schelp
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Pace v. Synchrony Bank
as 4:2024cv00662
Plaintiff: Anthony Pace
Defendant: Synchrony Bank
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?