Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in the US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio Before Judge Christopher Boyko
Cases 1 - 10 of 748
Johnson, Jr. v. Maiorana
as 4:2024cv00898
Petitioner: Melvin E. Johnson, Jr.
Respondent: Warden Charles Maiorana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Harris v. USA
as 4:2024cv00343
Petitioner: Bryan Harris
Respondent: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Collum v. USA
as 5:2024cv00323
Petitioner: Terry M. Collum
Respondent: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Sheridan v. USA
as 5:2024cv00327
Petitioner: Brandon L. Sheridan
Respondent: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Koch v. Lorain County, Ohio, et al.
as 1:2024cv00031
Plaintiff: Charles Koch
Defendant: Lorain County, Ohio, Lorain Board of County Commissioners, Sheriff Phillip R. Stammitti and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Millender v. USA
as 5:2023cv02460
Petitioner: Ralph L. Millender
Respondent: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Mohammed Ali v. Moore
as 5:2023cv02332
Petitioner: Juba Mohammed Ali
Respondent: Rochelle Moore
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Sanniti v. City of Cleveland, Ohio et al.
as 1:2023cv02118
Plaintiff: Steven Sanniti
Defendant: City of Cleveland, Ohio and Cleveland Police Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Marshall v. USA
as 5:2023cv01978
Petitioner: Delamon A. Marshall
Respondent: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Jones v. Fender
as 1:2023cv01866
Petitioner: Lee Jones
Respondent: Warden Douglas Fender
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?