Cases 1 - 10 of 16
IDS Race Holdings LLC v. ASAP Transport Solutions LLC et al
as 4:2023cv00227
Plaintiff:
IDS Race Holdings LLC
Defendant:
ASAP Transport Solutions LLC and Toplineservice, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 11707 Carmack Amendment
In Re: UIH Technologies, LLC
as 4:2022mc01150
Plaintiff:
UIH Technologies, LLC
Defendant:
Landstar Ranger, Inc. and Kuehne + Nagel, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Falick v. United Parcel Service Co.
as 4:2021cv02441
Plaintiff:
Michael Falick
Defendant:
United Parcel Service Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Indemnity Insurance Company of North America v. XPO Logistics Freight, LLC
as 4:2018cv00469
Plaintiff:
Indemnity Insurance Company of North America
Defendant:
XPO Logistics Freight, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Saber Global Logistics, Inc. v. Freedom 1, LLC
as 4:2017cv00984
Plaintiff:
Saber Global Logistics, Inc.
Defendant:
Freedom 1, LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 11707
United Van Lines, LLC v. Bishop et al
as 4:2013cv02239
Plaintiff:
United Van Lines, LLC
Defendant:
Stephen Bishop and Rose Bishop
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 81 Damaged Goods While Being Transported
The Jack Olsta Co. v. Atrans, LLC
as 4:2013cv01067
Plaintiff:
The Jack Olsta Co.
Defendant:
Atrans, LLC
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 81 Damaged Goods While Being Transported
Fad et al v. Farouk Systems, Inc.
as 4:2011cv00568
Plaintiff:
Salon Fad , Cindy's Hair Salon , Chu's Hair Salon and others
Defendant:
Farouk Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
LG Electronics USA, Inc. v. Ryder Integrated Logistics, Inc. et al
as 4:2008cv01949
Plaintiff:
LG Electronics USA, Inc.
Defendant:
Ryder Integrated Logistics, Inc., Innovative Logistics Services, Inc. and L&D Transportation Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
DSM Neoresins, Inc. v. Slay Transportation Co., Inc.
as 4:2008cv01930
Plaintiff:
DSM Neoresins, Inc.
Defendant:
Slay Transportation Co., Inc.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
