Cases 1 - 10 of 1,596
Thomas v. Lumpkin DO NOT DOCKET. Case transferred to Eastern District of Texas, Tyler Division.
as 4:2024cv01466
Petitioner:
Antoine Thomas
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Robertson v. Jerald K. Graber et al
as 4:2024cv01374
Plaintiff:
Carl W. Robertson
Defendant:
Jerald K. Graber, Terry Gaiser and Hazel B. Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Lumpkin
as 4:2024cv01387
Petitioner:
Matthew Jones
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Williams v. City of Houston
as 4:2024cv01324
Plaintiff:
Armando Williams
Defendant:
City of Houston
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
English v. The United States of America et al
as 4:2024cv01323
Petitioner:
James Thomas English
Respondent:
The United States of America and Brazoria County Courthouse
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Clarke v. Lumpkin
as 4:2024cv01305
Petitioner:
James David Clarke, Jr
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Pierre v. Harris County Detention Officers et al
as 4:2024cv01251
Plaintiff:
Frederick Cooks Pierre
Defendant:
Harris County Detention Officers, Officer Asegueda and Officer Dodson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Caldwell v. Estelle Unit
as 4:2024cv01216
Plaintiff:
Robert Caldwell
Defendant:
Estelle Unit
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
McCray v. Lumpkin
as 4:2024cv00917
Petitioner:
Donald McCray
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Stewart v. Lumpkin
as 4:2024cv00805
Petitioner:
Joshua Lynn Stewart
Respondent:
Brian Collier and Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
