Cases 21 - 30 of 1,602
Murphy v. Newton et al
as 4:2024cv00438
Plaintiff:
Jacob Earl Murphy
Defendant:
Anthony J. Newton, Bobby D. Rigsby and Caleb Bradley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Black v. 177th District Court, Harris County
as 4:2024cv00299
Plaintiff:
J.B. Black
Defendant:
177th District Court, Harris County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stewart v. Lumpkin
as 4:2024cv00805
Petitioner:
Joshua Lynn Stewart
Respondent:
Brian Collier and Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Diaz v. Lumpkins
as 4:2024cv00277
Petitioner:
Nelson Diaz
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkins and Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hyder v. Government of the States
as 4:2024cv00272
Plaintiff:
Calvin Hyder
Defendant:
Government of the States
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Emerueh et al
as 4:2023cv04821
Plaintiff:
Marcus Deon Johnson
Defendant:
Ngozika B. Emerueh, Ismaila Omotosho, Johnny W. Walker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davidson v. Deputy A. Harrison et al
as 4:2023cv04814
Plaintiff:
Robert Davidson
Defendant:
Deputy A. Harrison, Deputy J. Jollah and Deputy V. Hernandez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Drakos v. Gonzalez et al
as 4:2024cv00315
Plaintiff:
Ronald Thomas Drakos, II
Defendant:
Ed Gonzalez, Melissa Morris and Harris County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wilson v. Medical Supervisor et al
as 4:2023cv04697
Plaintiff:
Michael Wilson
Defendant:
Medical Supervisor, Mailroom Supervisor and Ed Gonzalez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Perkins v. Officer Ortiz
as 4:2024cv00194
Plaintiff:
Lewis Earl Perkins
Defendant:
Officer Ortiz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
