Cases 51 - 60 of 1,602
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv03653
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Mobley v. Warden Garrett et al
as 4:2023cv03481
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Mobley
Defendant:
Warden Garrett, Mrs. Nichols, Dept. of Justice-DOJ Director and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Searcy v. Brossard et al
as 4:2023cv03441
Plaintiff:
Bradley Searcy
Defendant:
Brandon Brossard and Robert Searcy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis v. Gonzalez
as 4:2023cv03332
Petitioner:
John Davis, Jr.
Respondent:
Ed Gonzalez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Byrd v. Lane et al
as 4:2023cv03299
Plaintiff:
David B Byrd
Defendant:
Darron A Lane, Jr, Homes L Sandles and Fernand F Fafso
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Hemphill v. Lumpkin
as 4:2023cv03231
Petitioner:
Justin Hemphill
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Cole v. San Jacinto County District Attorney(s) et al
as 4:2023cv03213
Plaintiff:
Richard Cole
Defendant:
San Jacinto County District Attorney(s), San Jacinto District Attorney Todd Dillon, San Jacinto County Sheriff's Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Blanton v. Sharp et al
as 4:2023cv03212
Plaintiff:
Billy C Blanton
Defendant:
Lynn Sharp and Terrel Prison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Vega v. Garcia et al
as 4:2023cv03278
Plaintiff:
Johnny Esquinia Vega
Defendant:
Garcia, Larry Oliverez, Hugo Stimmler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Annis v. The State of Texas
as 4:2023cv03280
Petitioner:
Rocky Annis
Respondent:
The State of Texas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
