Cases 21 - 30 of 57,643
CASTELLAW v. WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN TRANSIT AUTHORITY
as 1:2024cv01708
Plaintiff:
GARY CASTELLAW
Defendant:
WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN TRANSIT AUTHORITY
JEFFERSON v. SCIENCE APPLICATIONS INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION et al
as 1:2024cv01692
Plaintiff:
MARSELLES JEFFERSON
Defendant:
SCIENCE APPLICATIONS INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION, JEFFREY BURDETT, MATTHEW JAMISON and others
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729 False Claims Act
MCABEE v. LANCASTER et al
as 1:2024cv01686
Plaintiff:
RONALD COLTON MCABEE
Defendant:
CRYSTAL LANCASTER and DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
BARAHONA et al v. CARPENTERS OF GEORGETOWN, LLC et al
as 1:2024cv01685
Plaintiff:
OLVIN BARAHONA, JUAN OSCAR GUEVARA, SERGIO MARQUEZ DIAZ and others
Defendant:
CARPENTERS OF GEORGETOWN, LLC, NASHVILLE PEART and HOLLY PEART
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
harris v. focus llc et al
as 1:2024cv01687
Plaintiff:
julien harris
Defendant:
focus llc and neibu ali
ALFARO CRUZ v. ITALIANI, LLC et al
as 1:2024cv01691
Plaintiff:
BELARMINO ALFARO CRUZ
Defendant:
ITALIANI, LLC doing business as STELLINA PIZZERIA, ITALIANI SHIRLINGTON, LLC doing business as STELLINA PIZZERIA, MATTEO VENINI and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
AVILA v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD
as 1:2024cv01688
Plaintiff:
VICTOR AVILA
Defendant:
NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Review Agency Decision
LIANG v. Emmel et al
as 1:2024cv01690
Plaintiff:
KAI LIANG
Defendant:
Alissa Emmel and ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0701 Judicial Review of Agency Decision
SADIQ v. BLINKEN et al
as 1:2024cv01693
Plaintiff:
REHAN SADIQ
Defendant:
ANTONY J. BLINKEN, RENA BITTER, THATCHER SCHARPF and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
